1. The Defendant’s KRW 24,365,712 as well as the Plaintiff’s KRW 6% per annum from June 1, 2018 to December 21, 2018.

1. Acknowledgement of facts concerning the process of manufacturing and supplying ice, containers, etc.;

A. The Defendant manufactured and supplied four kinds of ice and ice, ice ice, ice, and other food and beverage products, etc., which were produced and sold by C (hereinafter “C”) from the beginning of 2015, as well as manufactured and supplied to C by the Defendant.

B. The defendant is the above A.

For the purpose of using the ice in supplying and selling the ice as mentioned in paragraph (1), the Plaintiff requested the production of each 4 kind of ice container, lid, lid, radar, Sticker, etc. (hereinafter referred to as “ice ice, etc.”) to the Plaintiff. From the beginning of 2015, the Plaintiff manufactured ice ice ices, etc. in accordance with the Defendant’s order and kept them as finished or as secondary materials at the pre-stage stage.

【In the absence of a dispute over a part of the grounds for recognition, entry of Gap evidence 1 and 2 (including partial number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion (i) the Plaintiff’s assertion, the Defendant, and C considered the short sale period of the ice and the complexity of the production process, in order to secure the stock of the container in advance, the quantity was examined from the four kinds of development stages of ice and the first product was to be produced after consultation as required.

Since then, the three companies have continuously agreed on the necessary volume, and the defendant ordered the plaintiff to accommodate ice, etc., and the plaintiff produced and stored the plaintiff. The plaintiff had reported to the defendant on the inventory, such as ice accommodation, etc., and no objection was raised by the defendant.

However, due to C’s poor business progress, the sales of ice four types of sales have not been properly conducted, and the inventory, such as ice storages produced by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant inventory”) remains unproof since the end of November 2016.