1. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for a year and six months, and the defendant B by imprisonment for a year;

2.Provided, That this ruling shall have become final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A has been working as the quality assurance team leader of a corporation E (hereinafter referred to as “E”) that supplies brade assemblies, fuel tank stamping, etc. from around December 1998 to November 2010, from around January 2013, to the Defense Acquisition Program Administration. Defendant B has served as the E quality assurance team leader from around December 2010 to December 2012, 201, and currently served as the deputy head of the E-technical research institute.

1. Defendant A

A. (1) In order to supply the “BE assembly,” the Defendant, who altered the official document, had been submitted a test report (number:G) in the name of the Administrator of the Small and Medium Business Administration in the name of the Daegu-do Small and Medium Business Administration on the “Industrial Bracking (Class 3 2)” corresponding to the original location of the “BE assembly” to the Defense Acquisition Program Administration. However, despite the submission of the test report (number:G) on the “Industrial Bring (Class 3 2)” the supply standard of the said parts, the Defendant attempted to modify the main contents of the said test report by recognizing the supply standard of the said parts as “industrial Bring (Class 3 1).”

On June 1, 2007, the Defendant revised the sample order of the test report under the name of the Administrator of the Small and Medium Business Administration of the Daegu-do Small and Medium Business Administration (Class 3 2) to the “Industrial Machinery Bracking (Class 3 1)” from May 12, 2007 to the “No. 14, 2007,” and the date of issuance to the “No. 0.55, the result of the items of the 250 degrees of the 200 degrees of the mashing,” “0 degrees of the 200 degrees of the Man-do,” and the result of the 250 degrees of the Man-do 250 degrees of the Man-do 250 degrees of the Man-do 23.

Accordingly, the defendant modified the results of the investigation under the name of the Administrator of the Small and Medium Business Administration in Daegu-Gyeongbuk District Office, which is an official document about certification of facts without authority.

(2) On June 2007, the Defendant’s uttering of an altered official document to the staff in charge of the Busan Center for Technology and Quality Agency who is not aware of the alteration at the above E office.