logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2014.04.16 2014고단187
위증등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Fraud;

A. On April 2009, the Defendant, at the office of E Co., Ltd. located in E Co., Ltd., Ltd. located in Sinju City, concluded that “any person who is working in the company managing E at home, and is related to the expressway rest area.” The Defendant falsely stated that “The Defendant would pay money at the test cost to make it possible for the snow ridge chain stores operated by the Nevis to work in the street rest area.”

However, in fact, the Defendant was engaged in the management of the collection of the fee for Tol in E Co., Ltd., and was not at a position to engage in the influence on the restaurant occupants, and was not well aware of the relevant business. While there was about 60 million won of the loan of financial institutions, the Defendant lives so-called return through credit card cash services, etc., and even if he received money from the victim, he did not have the intent or ability to allow the victim to move to the rest area.

Around April 15, 2009, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received the total amount of KRW 10 million from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative account under the name of the Defendant, KRW 5 million to the same account around April 30, 2009, and KRW 30 million to the same account around June 30, 2009.

B. In March 2010, the Defendant concluded that, as seen above, the cafeteria salesroom occupants promised to the victim did not run, that “the above victim continued to run a day-to-day shop building in the above office for the first time on March 2010, the Defendant made a false statement that “The said victim would have been promoting a day-to-day shop building. There is a door door for a day-to-day shop, and there is no power to make it possible for the snow-to-day shop chain stores operated by the NA to run money.”

However, the defendant is the above facts.

For the same reasons, there was no intention or ability to allow the ridge chain store operated by the victim to occupy the rest area.

The Defendant, as such, deceiving the victim and deceiving him, shall be from the victim on March 2010.

arrow