1. Defendant B Co., Ltd., and C, each of the Plaintiff, KRW 14,718,00,00 and Defendant B Co., Ltd., on July 24, 2013.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff, under the trade name of “E,” runs the business of supplying food materials to the occupant companies at the expressway resting, and the Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant B”) is an enterprise that leases and operates the F Stick line (hereinafter “instant Stick”); Defendant C is the representative director of the Defendant B, and Defendant D was in office as the director of the instant Stick.

B. On December 2012, the Plaintiff started discussions on the instant contract with Defendant D, with the content that the Plaintiff would occupy the “instant store” (hereinafter referred to as the “instant contract”) in the entire area of the H store operated by G and the immediate next vacant store (i.e., the store run by the I while operating the I; hereinafter the same shall apply), among the instant rest areas, in which the Plaintiff would occupy the “instant store”).

(The actual business of the plaintiff was conducted by J, the husband of the representative director and the actual representative director of the plaintiff).

In the business plan proposed by the Plaintiff to Defendant B, if the Plaintiff divided the instant store into seven parts, and colors up to seven shop occupants for each type of business, the content that Defendant B entered into a “on-site manufacturing supply contract” with the above shop occupants, and that the Plaintiff would provide food materials to the above shop occupants.

In the course of the discussion on the instant contract, Defendant D explained to the Plaintiff that the conclusion of the instant contract may require the interview of the shop occupants of Defendant C and the approval of the conclusion of the contract. The Plaintiff submitted the shop occupants proposal to Defendant B, prepared the cost calculation table of the goods by item and the store operation proposal under the provisions of Section B at the request of Defendant D, and the Defendant D reported these matters to Defendant C.

E. Defendant D acquires from G around February 2013 “K” stores within the instant rest area instead of H burial.