logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.01.29 2014가단4733
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 58,448,938 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from August 16, 2012 to January 29, 2016.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On August 15, 2012, at around 15:30 on August 15, 2012, the Plaintiff was faced with faces face in Gemanmangmang Gemang Gemang Gemang Gemang Gemang Gemang Gemang Gemang Gemang Gemang Gemang Gemang, who was unfolded by the Plaintiff.

B. The Plaintiff’s accident occurred to the right-side of the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff received first aid, such as washing the upper part of the plant in the emergency room of the Glang-do University Hospital Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”), and applied the Plaintiff to an emergency room of the Daegu-Magu Hospital affiliated with the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”), around 17:50 on the same day.

C. The inside department of the Defendant Hospital determined that the Plaintiff had no more than a movement of the same cT photography (computerizing floor shooting), face part X-RAY shooting, etc., and that there was no opinion such as clothes, strings, etc., and finally, determined that there was no opinion from the Plaintiff, the Defendant Hospital’s internal and partial strings, and instructed the Plaintiff to visit the Defendant Hospital again on the 18th of the same month.

In addition, in the sex surgery of the Defendant Hospital, the Plaintiff removed the parts of the body for the censorship and performed the crypology for the purpose of internal censorship.

Around 10:00 on the 17th of the same month prior to the date of the Plaintiff’s promise, the Plaintiff complained of the Defendant Hospital to the effect that there was a pain and pain on the part of the upper part of the wife from the day immediately preceding the date of the visit. The inside of the Defendant Hospital, after diagnosing the Plaintiff, determined to the effect that the Defendant Hospital’s internal medicine prescribed in king was maintained as is on the ground that there was a symptoms of internal autopsy, the part of the string, the part of the string, the part of the string, the part of the string, the string, and the part of the string, the string, and the part of the string, but there was no pressure, and the stringing symptoms.

E. The Plaintiff, at around 09:00 on the 18th of the same month following the following day, complained of the Defendant to the effect that the Plaintiff visited the Defendant’s hospital by visiting the Defendant Hospital at the same time, and that “I am off, but off,” and the Defendant.

arrow