logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2016.11.03 2016고단2963
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a CR-V 2WD (Mixed) car.

Around 07:55 on August 7, 2016, the Defendant driven the said car and proceeded to a one-lane road in front of the village located in the Si of Gwangju metropolitan City in the village of leaving the city in the village of Gwangju. On the other hand, the Defendant, by negligence, committed an act of violating the duty of a prior space screening, thereby damaging the part of the bicycle driven by the victim D (year 66) who was driving in the same direction from the right side of the Defendant’s vehicle to the right side of the said car, resulting in the victim’s injury, such as cutting down the front part of the said car, which requires approximately 14 weeks medical treatment, and at the same time, destroyed the victim’s bicycle to the right side of the said car of approximately 260,000 won, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A traffic accident report, a traffic accident report, each photograph, a44, a written diagnosis, and a written estimate (a statement that the defendant and his defense counsel had known the fact of the accident due to a stroke driving, but according to each evidence, some of the vehicles were destroyed due to the occurrence of the accident, and according to each evidence, the defendant was also found to have been driving on a bend road in a normal condition, and at the time, the defendant was trying to drive the victim's bicycle. In the police investigation, the defendant made a statement that he thought that the road would be at least a less designated management agency during the operation of the vehicle, but it was believed that the road would be at least a strike. Accordingly, this part is determined as impeachment evidence. Thus, the defendant is recognized to have known the fact of the accident or to have

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes related to the crime, Article 268 of the Criminal Act and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime;

1. Trade name;

arrow