The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) asserted “unfair sentencing” along with the allegation of “guilty fact” through the statement of reasons for appeal filed on May 17, 2017, but the above assertion is only asserted after the lapse of the period for submitting the appeal, and thus cannot be deemed a legitimate ground for appeal. Even if examining ex officio, there is no circumstance to newly consider in the trial, and thus, no separate determination of the grounds for appeal is possible.

① It is unclear whether a person who actually inflicts damage on a taxi in which the defendant was driving.

(2) Where a person who causes damage to a snow is faced with the above taxi, the accident has occurred.

The accident place is not a crosswalk as stated in the facts charged.

2. Determination

가. 먼저 위 ① 주장에 대하여 살피건대, 피고인 스스로도, ‘ 자신이 운전하던 택시의 조수석 쪽에서 ‘ 쿵’ 소리를 들어 인근에 차량을 주차하고 그 소리가 났던 곳으로 오니 피해자가 서 있었다‘ 고 진술하고 있는 바, 위와 같은 피고인의 진술에 의하더라도, 피고인이 운전하던 택시가 피해자를 충격한 사실은 명백해 보이므로, 피고인의 이 부분 사실 오인 주장은 이유 없다.

B. Next, the court below rejected the above argument: (a) the defendant alleged the same as the above argument in the court below; and (b) the court below stated the defendant's argument in detail under the title of "decision on the defendant's argument" in the judgment.

Examining the above judgment of the court below after comparing it with the records, the judgment of the court below is just, and there is no error of mistake of facts as pointed out by the defendant.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.