Text
1. The appeal by the defendant (appointed party) is dismissed;
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant (Appointed Party).
3...
Reasons
1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "Defendant B" in Part II of Part II of the judgment of the court of first instance is as "Appointed B"; "Appointed G" in the same behavior is as "Defendant B"; "the contract for the second and sixth works" in the part of the judgment of the court of first instance is as "the contract for the contract" (hereinafter "the contract for this case")"; "Defendant B" in the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, "Defendant B" in the 4th and 6th 6th 4th 6th 6th 6th 7th 7th 7th 17th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 7th 7th 17th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 6th 10th 7th 7th 6th 3th 40th 420 of the judgment of the court of first instance.
2. The part of the appeal is to the effect that "2 Defendants: (a) since N had the execution clause completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the real estate of this case from the Defendants after the judgment on the subrogation lawsuit of this case; (b) even if the Plaintiff was granted the execution clause, it is impossible to execute the execution clause; and (c) even if the disposal of the Defendants' third parties with respect to the real estate of this case is prohibited by the validity of the provisional disposition decision of this case, the Plaintiff, the holder of the right to preserve the real estate of this case, is not included in the third parties; and (d) as long as N lawfully acquired the Plaintiff's right to claim ownership transfer registration with respect to the real estate of this case from the Defendants and completed the registration of ownership transfer from the Defendants, the above registration in the name of N
The creditor shall be granted the execution clause in a lawsuit for grant of execution clause as provided in Article 33 of the Civil Execution Act.