logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2015.06.25 2015고단331
장물취득
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 1,000,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A and F purchased a mobile phone device voluntarily obtained by a taxi engineer who was unable to know his/her name in the taxi, etc., and purchased a mobile phone device from the taxi engineer on March 2015, and around April 2015.

On April 7, 2015, around 19:00 on April 7, 2015, the Defendant acquired stolen goods at KRW 1,000,00,00, after being aware of the fact that the market price of the mobile phone owned by the victims could not be known from the taxi engineers in front of the Daegu-dong Yacheon-dong apartment.

B. On April 13, 2015, the Defendant: (a) purchased 1.60,00 stolen goods in front of the HH Maart in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, on April 13, 2015; (b) on the front day of the HH Maart, where his name purchased from the taxi engineer cannot be known; and (c) purchased 2 cell phone devices with the victim’s mobile phone owner whose name cannot be known from the taxi engineer’s above, in awareness of the fact that it was a stolen.

C. On April 23, 2015, around 00:05, the Defendant acquired stolen goods at KRW 2.730,000,00, after being aware of the fact that the 19 mobile phone units, including the mobile phone unit 18 mobile phone units, are stolen, even though it is difficult to identify the market price that the Defendant purchased from F in front of the Bae-distance Samsung Service Center located in the Daegu-gu Daegu-gu Samsungdong-dong, Daegu-gu, and where he purchased from the taxi driver, the Defendant acquired stolen goods at KRW 2.73,00,00 from F.

2. Defendant B, at around 03:30 on March 29, 2015, arrived at the front of the apartment road by taking the victim I into possession of a taxi that he operated on his own, and having an apartment in the north-gu, the North-gu, the destination of which was remote, but the victim was living together and did not pay the taxi expenses. However, the market price of the taxi is equivalent to 300,000,000 won, where the victim’s cash, which is the victim’s possession, was included in the main money on the part of the victim who did not pay the taxi expenses.

arrow