logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원(청주) 2017.05.24 2016누10900
사업계획승인취소처분취소 등
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court's explanation of this case is as follows: "Nos. 1" in Section 4 through 7, 9, 10, 18, 20 of the first instance court's 8th, 16, 17 of the first instance court's 8th, "Nos. 1 through 12 of the A, Eul's 16 to 27 of the evidence, and Eul's 16 to 17 of the first instance court's 8th court's 9th 4 to 7 of the 9th 7th .

Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act shall be cited as it is in accordance with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except that the Plaintiff only took temporary measures, such as removing the tin by December 31, 2015, which was finally granted by the Defendant, and installing a water network on the slope, and not only did the above time limit, but also did not start or set up a drainage, retaining wall, and legal surface construction, which is essential to prevent the collapse of the embankment and the damage to earth and sand erosion, even if up to the time of the instant disposition."

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow