logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.07.09 2019가단5157157
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The defendant's KRW 112,845,500 to the plaintiff A, KRW 5,000,000 to the plaintiff B, and KRW 2,00,000 to the plaintiff C and D respectively.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. 1) F is a low-speed vehicle on November 9, 2017 (hereinafter “overboard vehicle”) around 00:27, 2017.

(B) Plaintiff A’s H taxi vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) prior to Plaintiff A’s operation while driving a two-lane of the G segment of the petition-gu G in the Cheongju-si.

2) The instant prior accident was inferred (hereinafter “prior accident”).

) Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s vehicle was stopped within two lanes, and the Nonparty’s vehicle was stopped across the median line. immediately after the said accident, the Plaintiff’s driver’s Jinna vehicle’s vehicle volume (hereinafter “Defendant 1 vehicle”) proceeding one-lane in the opposite direction while going to the driver’s seat of Nonparty A in order to deal with the accident that was brought off by the Plaintiff from the center line.

(ii) The Plaintiff A was shocked with the left-hand fences and joints of Defendant A’s vehicle, and followed by Defendant A’s LPP car volume (hereinafter “Defendant 2”) for Defendant A’s vehicle following the vehicle.

(1) The accident between the plaintiff A and the defendant 1 and the two vehicles was caused by the shocking of the plaintiff A, who was sitting on a one-lane of the above road (hereinafter referred to as "the accident of this case").

2) As a result of the instant accident, Plaintiff A suffered injuries, such as Dam cage cage cage cage cages, damage to external wounds crym fry, damage to external wounds crym fry, damage to external wounds hym frym, secondary crym frym, staleing, chym gym fry, gym gym fry, eeel fume, knee-fry, etc.

3) The Defendant is an insurer who entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract for Defendant 1 and 2 vehicles. 4) The Plaintiff is the spouse of Plaintiff B, and the father of Plaintiff C and D.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap's 1 through 7, 15, Eul's 1 through 4, and 8 (including paper numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings and arguments

B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the defendant was injured by the plaintiff A due to the operation of the defendant 1 and 2 vehicles, and barring any special circumstance, the defendant 1 and 2 vehicles.

arrow