The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

On May 20, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 21:50 on May 20, 2014, at the D restaurant located in Namyang-ju C, and (b) on May 20, 201, the Defendant, while drinking alcohol, was fluored with alcohol and shouldered, and fluored with a fluor’s name.

The Defendant: (a) on the ground that the victim E was aware of that he was a witness, “I would like to find out why he was a personal privacy; (b) is personally known; (c) is well aware of his house and classical body; and (d) is aware of anywhere. The Defendant informed the victim to the effect that “I would have any harm and injury to the victim” was to be abandoned.

Judgment

The above facts charged are crimes falling under Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express will in accordance with paragraph (3) of the same Article.

On January 6, 2015, however, the victim withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant.

Therefore, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.