logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.11.04 2015고정120
공무집행방해
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

공소사실 피고인은 2014. 9. 6. 05:00경 대전 서구 C에 있는 D주점 앞길에서 폭력신고를 받고 출동 중이던 대전둔산경찰서 E지구대 소속인 경위 F, 경장 G, 경위 H, 경사 I이 술에 취해 길 한가운데로 걷고 있는 피고인에게 경적을 울리며 비켜달라고 요구하였음에도 불응하여 도로에 그대로 서 있었다는 이유로 시비가 되어 경찰관들에게 “짭새 새끼들이 지랄한다”고 욕설을 하면서 순찰차를 가로막은 후 상의를 벗고 몸에 물을 뿌리고 순찰차 본네트를 양손으로 치는 등의 방법으로 약 20여 분간 공무수행 중인 경찰관들의 업무를 방해하고 도로에서 교통에 방해되는 방법으로 서 있었다.

Judgment

According to each evidence duly adopted and examined by the court, the following facts are found: the defendant, who was walking before the patrol police officer, was resisting to the end of the patrol police officer, and the police officer was not traveling ahead of the patrol police officer, and the defendant was notified that he would arrest the defendant as a flagrant offender in the obstruction of performance of official duties; and the defendant was out of his body and flabed with water, and the fact that the police officer was flabed with flab by hand.

Witness

F, G, H, and I stated in this Court that this Court was off the Defendant’s body, frightened the patrol car, and frightened the Defendant’s body before the arrest. However, I stated that it was difficult for the Defendant to have avoided any disturbance, such as cutting off and dusting the Defendant’s name in the course of investigation in the course of arresting the Defendant while preparing a written self-written statement in the course of investigation. The Defendant consistently asserts that the Defendant was consistently deprived of water and frighted during the course of arrest, the witness J, and K made a statement consistent with the Defendant, and other adjacent CCTVs taken on the scene of this case by an investigative agency, or black boxes attached to the two patrol vehicles.

arrow