logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.05.18 2016고단5892
도로교통법위반(무면허운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant of "2016 Highest 5892" is the owner of Brane vehicle.

1. On October 31, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) driving on the road, without obtaining a license from around 15:00 on October 31, 2016, the volume of approximately 5km from the front of the Yongsandong Hospital in the Yongsandong in Gwangju-gu to the front of the Samsung Digital F&D, 107 as the same Gu cancer.

2. No person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation shall operate any motor vehicle on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance;

Nevertheless, around 15:00 on October 31, 2016, the Defendant operated a passenger car owned by the Defendant, which was not covered by mandatory insurance from the Yongsandong Hospital in front of the Yongsandong, Gwangju, to the front day of Samsung Digital Fran, No. 107, as the same Gu cancer.

The defendant of "2017 Highest 1132" is a person engaged in driving C and freight cars.

On March 10, 2017, the Defendant, without obtaining a driver's license for a motor vehicle on March 18, 2017, proceeded ahead of the road in Gwangju Northern-gu D into the e-mail from the modern apartment zone.

In the same direction as at the time, the victim F (23 Do) driven behind the G G- E- E-M vehicle was followed, so the person engaged in the vehicle driving service has a duty of care to ensure a safe distance that can be avoided when the vehicle stops, while the person engaged in the vehicle driving service has a duty of care.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and stopped due to the suspension of a vehicle that was driven prior to the collision due to the negligence of the Defendant’s failure to stop, and received the part that was loaded behind the Eth-Ma cargo vehicle and was in front of the cargo vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as fluoral salt, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

"2016 Highest 5892"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of control and electronic data (license, chassis, ...);

arrow