A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power】 On July 27, 1995, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime at the Suwon District Court on August 21, 2002 at the Changwon District Court for a maximum of two years, with prison labor for a short of one year and six months, and on March 14, 2005 at the Busan District Court for the same crime. On August 26, 2008, the Defendant completed the execution of the sentence on July 3, 2012.

【Criminal Facts of Crimes】 On December 12, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 14:00, around 14:00, at the victim’s house of the third floor of the E cafeteriaed building operated by Daegu-guned Group C; (b) divided the front door password, which was put to work as a restaurant employee, and opened the front door and entered into the house; and (c) cut off the cash of 300,000 won owned by the victim in the West on the book at that place.

The Defendant habitually stolen or attempted property worth KRW 27,552,00,000 in total from the Daegu, Cheongju, Cheongju, Gyeongnam-gun, Jin-si, Jinju-si, and Busan, from around August 2013, as shown in the list of crimes committed in the attached Table, from around 35 times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to F, G, and H;

1. Each statement of I, D, J, K, L, M, N, P, Q, Q, S, T, U, V,W, X, Y, and Z;

1. Each investigation report, internal investigation report, on-site identification report, and on-site identification report, and on-site identification of and cooperation to ascertain the details of the settlement of cases related to the DNA conformity (including each accompanying document and photograph);

1. A sales contract or photograph for a secondhand computer;

1. Each protocol of seizure;

1. Records before judgment: Criminal records, etc., an inquiry report, an investigation report, and a report on internal investigation (attached to a written judgment);

1. Habituality of the judgment: Defendant’s theft habits is recognized in light of the following: (a) the criminal history of each crime, the number of crimes, the frequency of crimes, and the punishment imposed for the same kind of crime in the judgment has not yet been imposed, and thus repeatedly commits the larceny of the same veterinary act.

Application of Statutes

1. Criminal facts;