beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor of two years and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment of one year and six months, and Defendant C and D shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of one year and one year.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A, around September 14, 2013, at the similarity trading place of “H” in the name of Defendant B, C, etc., operated by Defendant B, etc., of the building 618 in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Defendant A, at around 14:30 on September 4, 2013, tried to rape the victim in the course of having math from the victim I (the age of 33), and obstructed Defendant A from resisting the victim by putting the victim on the bend in the bend part of the body of the victim, taking a part in the bend part of the body of the victim and taking part in the shoulder part of the victim, and raped the victim once.
2. Defendant B, C, and D related to the control of June 12, 2013: (a) Defendant B, C, and D decided to distribute profits while operating a similar trading establishment with the trade name “H” in the above officetels, respectively, leased Nos. 502, 618, 903, 1208, 1313, 1317, and 1412 in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City.
The above Defendants advertised the above business site on the Internet advertising site called “J” and “K” and employed female employees through the Internet offer site called “L”.
In addition, Defendant D paid investment money to take charge of overall management of business establishments, and Defendant B and C were working as the office of each of the above business establishments and were in charge of duties such as receiving customers and guiding them to the room.
Defendant
B, C, and D conspired on June 12, 2013, around 20:15, 200, received 80,000 won in cash from M, a customer, who was found at the above establishment, and provided guidance to the above M as an officetel 903, and arranged N, an employee, N, as his/her hand, to engage in the similarity behavior that leads to the scambling of the above customer’s sexual organ with his/her hand, as well as arranging such similar behavior from May 1, 2013 to June 12, 2013.
3. Defendant B and C’s co-principal conduct
(a) Violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts (the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.) - Defendant B related to September 4, 2013.