Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 1,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 300,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A runs the advertising business under the trade name of “D”, and Defendant B as an employee of Defendant A, the Defendants conspiredd to collect and abolish the advertising paper attached to apartment entrance, etc. by the “F” operated by the victim E, a competitor, to the floor.

Defendant

A From around January 25, 2017, at the D office located in Sinpo City, around 1, 2017, Defendant B “A” means “D advertising sites are attached to the third apartment of Sinpo City in Sinpo City in Nam, the second apartment of Southern Don High, the second apartment of Sinpo City in South Don High, and the EF advertising site attached to the apartment entrance, etc. on the apartment entrance, etc., and the Defendants are attached to the apartment entrance.” On the same day, the Defendants were attached to the second apartment of Sinpo City in Gunpo City, the Defendant was engaged in D publicity in neighboring commercial buildings, and the Defendant B collected approximately 200 advertising sites of the victims attached to the Southern Don High, the second apartment entrance in Gunpo City, etc., and the victim’s 15th Donpo City in South Don apartment, the victim’s 15th Donpo City in South Don apartment, etc. attached to the victim’s front 2.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to obstruct the victim's advertising business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ partial statements in the first public trial protocol

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the Defendants

1. Statement protocol by the police for E;

1. CCTV photographs, photographs of each field and recording records;

1. A contract for approval for the installation of an apartment advertisement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Articles 314(1) and 314(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the Defendants who choose to commit the crime;

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the Provisional Payment Order: The judgment of the Defendants on the assertion by the Defendants under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is to interfere with E’s business with respect to the collection of advertisements distributed in apartment units at will by E.