The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On November 5, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 01:55, the Defendant: (b) was seated in the victim’s women’s fluor and vehicle on the front side of the 5-dong-dong-dong-ro 414, dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-

2. The above facts charged are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the same Act. Since it is apparent that the victims have withdrawn their wish to punish the defendant after submitting a written agreement stating the victim’s wish not to be punished after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.