(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.07.19 2017가단5141905

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.07.19 2017가단5141905

보험금

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 63,650,920 for the Plaintiff and 6% per annum from May 31, 2017 to August 18, 2017.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff concluded a lease contract for the existing house for the low-income bracket, and subsequently, concluded a lease contract for the existing house for the low-income bracket, and subsequently, concluded an agreement with the Defendant on the management of credit insurance for the pre-paid rental house (hereinafter “instant agreement”) with the lower-income bracket in order to guarantee the recovery of the lease deposit that the Plaintiff paid to the housing owner as the lessee in relation to the pre-paid rental business. In relation to such pre-paid rental business, the Plaintiff purchased a lease insurance for the pre-paid rental house (hereinafter “instant agreement”).

B. On July 7, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement on a pre-existing house lease business with A and its own Nam-si, as follows:

① The first house of this case (hereinafter referred to as “the second house of this case”): 67 million won of the deposit for the deposit for the deposit for the deposit for the lease on a deposit basis, from August 10, 2015 to August 9, 2017, and from August 10, 2017, the resident C (hereinafter referred to as “the first house of this case”) (hereinafter referred to as “the second house of this case”): 68 million won of the deposit for the lease on a deposit basis, from July 30, 2015 to July 29, 2017; 3502 of the deposit for the deposit for the lease on a deposit basis, from August 10, 2015 to August 9, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “the deposit for the lease on a deposit basis”): 65 million won of the deposit for the deposit for the lease on a deposit basis, and from July 30, 2015 to July 27, 2017.

C. In addition, based on each of the above lease contracts on the same day, the Plaintiff concluded a housing lease agreement with each of the tenants (C, D, and E) for the “existing Housing Lease Project” (hereinafter “each of the instant lease agreements”). D.

The main contents of each of the credit insurance contracts for rental housing (hereinafter “each of the insurance contracts of this case”) entered into with the Defendant as the policyholder and the insured with respect to the housing of this case are as follows:

1. The first house in this case

유사 판례

-광주지방법원 2016.12.23 2016나4675

-수원지방법원안산지원 2019.04.26 2018가단70151

-대구지방법원 2019.06.25 2018가단133721

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.04.28 2014가단5097021

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.10.20 2016가단5094309