Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 14, 2020, at around 03:00, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s left shoulder part of the body of the victim’s hand while the Defendant she saw the victim’s male-friendly room in the victim’s D (the victim’s 24 years old) suffered a traffic accident and took a photograph.

2. Interference with performing public duties;

A. The Defendant interfered with the police officer E’s performance of official duties at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, as seen above, sent to the site after receiving 112 reports that a traffic accident occurred while D and C were in motion, and solicited the police officer E, a police officer affiliated with the Seocho-gu Police Station F District Police Station, who carried out the instant disposition, to have the Defendant assaulted the victim, and to return home in his/her hand, as stated in paragraph 1, and caused the occurrence of the traffic accident.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

B. The Defendant was dissatisfied with the police officer E and G’s performance of official duties on the same day on the ground that G and E, a police officer belonging to the F District Police Station of the Seocho-gu Police Station, called F District, dispatched to the site after receiving a report from 112 of D that he/she would receive the assault case before I located in Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, 04:30 on the same day, were dissatisfied with the notification of the investigation procedure and soliciting the police officer to return home, and whether he/she received the flick, Sick, Sick, and flick;

Before 10 minutes of the patrol car intending to move to another place continuously, it interfered with the progress of patrol car for about 10 minutes, such as setting the chief hand hand of the patrol car to be moved to the other place, and selling the chief window to be taken by drinking.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to E and G;

1. Written statements of D and J;

1. Investigation report (victim D telephone communications);

1. Application of the statutes on the photograph of this case

1. Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 260 of the Criminal Act (the point of violence) as to the facts of crime respectively.