1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the part arising from the supplementary participation.

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the judgment, is as stated in the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding some contents as set forth in the following paragraph (2). Thus, this is cited by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

In addition, the following shall be added to the upper part of the judgment of the first instance, the second part of the judgment of the first instance, as set forth below:

G. On January 31, 2017, the Intervenor filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff seeking damages until the Seoul Central District Court 2017Gahap506191, which was the Seoul Central District Court 2017, and the said court rendered a judgment accepting the Intervenor’s claim on August 31, 2017. The Plaintiff dissatisfied with the judgment and filed an appeal as Seoul High Court 2017Na2052833, which is currently pending in the appellate court’s lawsuit. The Plaintiff added “No. 23 evidence” as set forth in the table of the fourth part of the judgment of the first instance.

On the fifth and sixth pages of the first instance judgment, the following shall be added.

"4 The plaintiff urged the plaintiff to apply for re-election at the level of giving the opportunity to re-examine considering the plaintiff's promise to prevent recurrence, etc., and the period of appointment expires, and thus the disposition of this case is justified.

"On the 16th page of the first instance judgment, the following is added.

In full view of the respective descriptions and arguments stated in Gap evidence Nos. 24, 25, and Eul evidence Nos. 38, on June 30, 2016, the Intervenor took an interview with the president of the Plaintiff and the president of Cuniversity on July 18, 2016, after the additional interview with the president on July 18, 2016, the Intervenor took place in the teachers’ personnel committee on August 8, 2016, and promised to recognize errors and prevent recurrence. On August 12, 2016, the Intervenor puts a notice on the bulletin board of the Love Sharing of Schools to the effect that the Intervenor officially promised to prevent recurrence.