logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2014.06.19 2014고정174
사기등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 9, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Changwon District Court for embezzlement, etc. and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 15, 2014.

1. Fraud;

A. On October 20, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim at an O charging station operated by the victim N in Sacheon-si, Sacheon-si, that “The Defendant would pay the LPG every 15 days on the face of filling it outside the country.”

However, even if the defendant is supplied with LPG from the victim, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the price.

The Defendant, as above, by deceiving the victim, received LPG equivalent to 37,700 won at the market price from the victim’s position.

In addition, from around that time to November 21, 2012, the Defendant received the LPG equivalent to KRW 639,900 in total from the victim 14 times as stated in attached Table (i).

Accordingly, the defendant acquired the victim's property by fraud.

B. On November 2012, the Defendant concluded that “AR station operated by the victim Q Q Q in Sacheon-si P will perform the construction of a farm in Sacheon-si, but will pay the purchase price ten days after the date of supply of the equipment to the public corporation.”

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the price even if he was supplied through the victim.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, was supplied by the victim via the market price of 34,00 won at that place.

In addition, from around that time to December 19, 2012, the Defendant received a total of KRW 4,069,504 from the victim over five times, as indicated in the Sheet List of Crimes.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired the victim's property by fraud.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Labor Standards Act is an employer who runs a pharmaceutical re-collection business using six workers in the first half of Jinju-si.

The Defendant on July 4, 2012

arrow