(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.01.24 2017나2708 | 리걸엔진

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.01.24 2017나2708

용역대금

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court of first instance’s explanation as to this case is as follows, except for the following determination as to the assertion that the pertinent part was cited or added and the Defendant added to the trial, and thus, it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance. Thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Parts used or added;

A. Of the first instance judgment, the part of the second instance judgment: ① “684,914,160 won” in Part 9 of the second instance judgment is “the Plaintiff seeks from among KRW 684,914,160”; ② “the supplied amount” in Part 4 of the fourth instance judgment is “the supplied amount”; ③ “the Defendant’s limit” in Part 8 of the fourth instance judgment is respectively applied to “the Plaintiff.”

B. Of the first instance judgment, the following is added: ① “The testimony of witnesses G of the Si/Gun/Gu Party 4” and ② “The testimony of the witness G of the Si/Gun/Gu Party 4” and ② “The plaintiff has completed the cooperative relationship with E” on September 2014 or around March 2015 (see, e.g., grounds for appeal Nos. 6 and week 4) and thereafter on December 28, 2015, even if there was an agreement between the defendant and E on the operating expenses of the “B market AD installation project,” the contents of the said agreement cannot be deemed to affect the plaintiff,” respectively. Further, the defendant is found to have reached the first instance judgment. The defendant requested the Yong-Nam branch office of the Si Party 4 to make a new business registration and prepared a new business registration, which merely constitutes a false declaration, and there is no evidence to acknowledge the above facts as invalid, but there is no reason to prove otherwise.

4. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is justified within the above scope of recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is consistent with this conclusion.

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 2017.01.25 2016나224

-대구지방법원 2018.01.24 2017나303753

-대구지방법원 2018.02.07 2017나309768

-대구지방법원 2017.12.13 2017나306486

-대구지방법원 2017.08.23 2016나14674