logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.02.16 2016가합2696
지체상금 등 청구의 소
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 2,809,560 as well as 5% per annum from May 17, 2016 to February 16, 2017 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The status of the Plaintiff is a company with the objective of manufacturing and constructing factory automation equipment and engineering service business, and the Defendant is a company with the purpose of robot system and parts development, robot manufacturing business, etc.

B. 1) The Plaintiff entered into the instant contract on November 5, 2014 (hereinafter “scarcity”)

B) On November 14, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant for the production and supply of the DNA (NB) and the primary confidential automation equipment (hereinafter “instant contract”) between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, and the Defendant entered into a contract for the production and supply of the exhaustor (hereinafter “instant machinery”) with the United Nations (NB). The main contents are as follows.

Article 1 The kinds, quantities, unit prices, and supply amounts of gold goods to be supplied by the Defendant to the Plaintiff shall be as follows:

(Value-added tax separate). The machinery of this case is a shoe type, unit price and supply amount of one shock (shoe), 1 to 15,829,000 won and 2NB, 60,329,000 won and 60,329,000 won and 1) the place of delivery of the object is an scarb precision 2 factory located in the window. 2) The machinery of this case is completed on January 10, 2015 and is completed within January 15, 2015, with the equipment meeting the standards for specifications.

Article 3:The remaining 70%,230,300 won shall be paid in cash in the following month after the completion of the contract within seven days after the completion of the contract.

Article 5 The defendant shall be liable for delay payment equivalent to 3/1,00 of the unpaid amount per day without delay where the acceptance and delivery of the object are delayed or where the quantity of the object is not fully satisfied even though the delivery is made (excluding natural disasters, force majeure cases, etc. and cases due to causes attributable to the plaintiff) and damages for delay for transfer.

arrow