A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 23:55 on September 12, 2014, the Defendant expressed that he would not pay taxi expenses to the taxi on the front side of the 10-Do Do Do Do dong-dong-ro, Changwon-si, and would like to do so, and that he would pay the taxi expenses from the victim of the Do Do Do Do 112 reported by the 112 taxi article, and that he would pay the aforementioned police officer, while the above taxi article et al. are kept, the Defendant insultingd the victims of the said police officer by saying, “the Do Do Do dong-dong Do Do Do Do Do 1333444, May 12, 2014, he would be called as “the Do Do Do 13334, May 12, 2014.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. E statements;

1. Application of each statute on filing of a complaint;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution does not pay the taxi expenses for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, and the police officers who were sent out after receiving a report of escape from the Republic of Korea, have no record of crime except for those sentenced to a fine for violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) in 2004, and the crime is de facto divided. In addition, the circumstances and result of the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances after the crime, etc. are considered.