Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person engaged in driving a C-A-Wurt Motor Vehicle.

On August 31, 2013, the Defendant operated the said car on August 31, 2013, and continued to drive the said car on the front of the tin teahouse, which was located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, with a view to getting the front of the instant teahouse, on the side of the foreign language university.

As a second line, commercial buildings are concentrated on both sides of the road, and pedestrians are likely to cross without permission because they are in the vicinity of India, so a person engaged in driving service has the duty of care to check whether there is a person who gets on a road by reducing speed and by properly examining the right and the right and the right of the road, and to drive safely.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and proceeded as it is, by negligence, was led to the victim D(70 years old) who is crossing the road from the left side of the driver's car to the right side of the road.

Ultimately, at around 08:38 of the same day by occupational negligence, the Defendant caused the death of the victim at the F Hospital located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, due to low volume shock.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. A corpse of corpse;

1. Application of visual image-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. 【Suspension of Execution” under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act 【The Defendant is able to repent in depth the primary offender, agree with the victim’s bereaved family members, subscribe to a comprehensive insurance; the victim was unable to cross the road without permission during the night-time attendance hours; and the Defendant’s family relationship and family conditions are determined in consideration of all the circumstances;