logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2016.02.16 2015고정1292
개인정보보호법위반
Text

Defendant

A and B shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

Defendant

A and B fail to pay each of the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the chairman of the Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Committee for Election Management of F Apartments (hereinafter referred to as the “this apartment”), Defendant B is the managing director of the apartment in this case, Defendant C is the managing director of the apartment in this case.

On October 27, 2014, G, H, and I sent to the Management Office of the Apartment Building a list of the Signatories' Representatives' Representatives' Representatives' Representatives' Representatives' Representatives' Representatives' Representatives' Representatives' E, and on October 24, 2014, the above dismissal was not known while serving a list of the occupants' Representatives' Representatives' Representatives' Representatives' and Audit Audit and Inspection's Dismissals's Dismissals's Dismissals' (hereinafter "this list") with the name, number, and contact numbers of 725 Personal Informations' Residents' Representatives' Representatives' Representatives's Representatives's Representatives's Representatives's Representatives's Residents' Representatives' Representatives' and Eul's Representatives's Representatives's Representatives' and this list of Representatives's Representatives's Representatives' and Audit and Inspection's Dismissals's Dismissals', and the above resolution was delivered to the Management Office, and the above resolution was delivered to the Committee.

However, as seen in [Judgment as to Defendant B, C, and Defense Counsel’s argument], a resolution of the election commission by the competent election commission is deemed to have been delivered after the date of dismissal and list.

No person who has managed or processed personal information shall divulge personal information he/she becomes aware of in the course of performing his/her duties or provide it to another person without authority.

Nevertheless, around October 29, 2014, the Defendants conspired with the Defendant to give final approval on the above official document by Defendant C, Defendant B, following Defendant B, to the above J and the above K as well as the above official document, on the official document of the apartment management office of this case located in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

In this respect.

arrow