logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.05.12 2016고단296
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2016 Highest 296"

1. On October 22, 2015, the Defendant, despite having no intent or capacity to sell vehicle supplies, posted a letter to the victim C (34 tax) who contacted with the Plaintiff, stating that the Defendant sold the wheel chairs of the HG car at the Internet Nurier Kafa on October 22, 2015.

Along with the false statement, it received 4,313,00 won from 14 times until December 17, 2015, including the receipt of 510,000 won from the Saemaul Treasury account (D) in the name of the defendant from the damaged person, and acquired 4,313,00 won from that time to December 17, 2015.

"2016 Highest 832"

2. The Defendant is a member of the Suwon-si E-dong local reserve forces in Suwon-si.

No member of the local reserve forces shall file a resident registration report differently from the fact without any justifiable reason so that his/her residence is unknown.

Nevertheless, even though the Defendant resided in the Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Public Notice Board located in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant reported a resident registration differently from the fact that he/she resides in Suwon-si G and 303, without good cause, and had the Defendant registered as a person who was missing on August 18, 2015.

"2016 Highest 1279"

3. On September 10, 2015, the Defendant, using a computer installed in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F, sent a false statement to the effect that “I wish to purchase a yellow TG to purchase it” posted by the victim H by accessing the Internet, which is a trading site for used goods, using a computer installed therein, and then made a false statement to the victim that “I will send the goods if you transfer KRW 40,000 won to the victim.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any goods sold to the victim, and even if he received money from the victim, he thought that he would use the money for living expenses, so that he did not have any intention or ability to send the goods to the victim from the beginning.

After all, the defendant deceivings the victim as above.

arrow