(영문) 창원지방법원 밀양지원 2019.06.11 2018고단324

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 창원지방법원 밀양지원 2019.06.11 2018고단324

상해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 17:30 on December 29, 2017, the Defendant: (a) sought a dispute between the Defendant and the victim D (the 51-year-old-old-year-old-old-old-old-old-gun) and the Defendant’s 17:30 on December 29, 2017; (b) sought the horses from the restaurant proprietor that she would come out of the restaurant; (c) sought the horses that she would come out of the restaurant; and (d) sustained the victim’s breath of the breama’s breath to live outside the restaurant with the victim; and (d) sustained the victim’s left breath of the breama’s breath by drinking the breath of the body of the victim for about two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. The injury diagnosis report and on-site photo (victim's body photo) (the defendant and his defense counsel asserted that there is no fact about the victim, and that this part of the facts charged is denied. However, according to the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, the witness F, in the investigation agency and this court, stated the following circumstances as follows: (a) the victim was put to a mixed drinking in the restaurant as stated in this part of the facts charged, and (b) the victim was placed in the contact with the defendant and the victim was placed in front of the restaurant again more than 10 minutes; and (c) the victim was her left, and there was little money, so, the witness E stated that he was the person who was aware of the victim at the time of the victim; (d) the witness E stated that the victim was aware of the victim's identity at the time of this court; and (e) the victim was present at the time of the victim's interview and the victim's statement related to E in this part of the facts charged at the time of his escape."

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 안동지원 2019.05.10 2017고단622

-인천지방법원 2013.06.14 2013노833

-서울서부지방법원 2014.07.24 2013노1415

-서울동부지방법원 2014.03.28 2013고단2228

-창원지방법원 2014.12.24 2014노2056