logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2014.04.23 2014고단207
청소년보호법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant runs a business that operates Schlage.

On October 21, 2013, the defendant was prohibited from selling tobacco, etc., which is a harmful drug to juveniles, to juveniles, but around October 17, 2013, the defendant sold 1 to E (Nam, 13 years of age) a string tobacco (2,500) in Busan Shipping Daegu D, and on October 22, 2013, sold 1 to E (2,700 won) in the above place.

2. We examine the judgment, there are E’s written statements, explanatory notes, and police statements of E as evidence corresponding to the facts charged in the instant case, and all of them are that the Defendant sold tobacco at the date and place as determined in E in which the Defendant is a juvenile.

그런데 E은 이 법정에서 피고인으로부터 직접 담배를 산 것이 아니라 제3자를 통하여 샀다고 증언하고 있는바, 법정에서 이루어진 E의 위 증언과 배치되는 위 증거들만으로 피고인이 청소년인 E에게 판시와 같이 담배를 팔았다고 인정하기에는 부족하고 달리 공소사실을 인정할 증거가 없다.

3. In conclusion, the above facts charged constitute a case where there is no proof of crime and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act

arrow