A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 21, 2017, at around 22:30 on March 21, 2017, the Defendant: (a) from the “D main point operated by the Victim C in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government,” the Defendant, without any justifiable reason, debrising the customer by her hand, thereby debrising the client’s seat, bed, and (b) the Defendant may perform funeral in the name of the victim who restrains the customer from doing so.

“Plux,” Mari-rih, other customers who were next to the Mari-rih, “The head of the Mak Mabb Mabbbb nb, which is the head of the Mason-dok, and Iknb.

The victim’s main business affairs were obstructed by putting the victim at a large interest.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reports (for witness at the scene and wire or telephone call);

1. Relevant Article 314 of the Criminal Act, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is against the Defendant’s attempt to commit the instant crime.

A defendant has no previous offense, other than twice a fine, except for such offense.

Along with the victim, the agreement was reached.

All circumstances, such as these circumstances and the age, sex, motive of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, shall be determined in accordance with the order, taking comprehensive account of all the circumstances of the defendant.