(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.12.07 2017가단9839

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.12.07 2017가단9839

대여금

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff is a person running a water purifier siren business with the trade name of "C" and the plaintiff was a merchant at the time of each lending of this case, and the plaintiff does not clearly dispute the defendant's repeated argument that the plaintiff was a merchant.

The defendant is a person who engages in the business of mutual recognition as "D".

(F) Business registration on March 25, 2009.

The loan certificate that the defendant recognizes that the signature portion of the plaintiff's currently possessed by himself is by the pen (hereinafter "the loan certificate of this case") is as follows:

The loan certificate B B (1) The loan certificate B (B) the loan certificate of this case borrowed from F on January 31, 2007 and borrowed on January 31, 2007, the name of the holder of the second loan certificate B (2) the loan certificate of this case borrowed from F on January 31, 2007: The name of the holder of the second loan certificate: The address of the debtor: B name and address of the debtor: B address: contact information:

1. Daily gold: Ilcheon (12,000,000 Won); and

2. Date of repayment: November 30, 2015;

3. Interest:

4. Method of payment:

5. Where the payment method No. 4 is a installment payment, if it is not made any one time, the payment shall naturally lose the benefit of time and shall immediately pay the remainder in full.

6. If necessary, sign a joint and several surety, and the joint and several suretys shall guarantee this obligation and shall be responsible for the performance of the obligation with the above obligor.

The debtor's name as of November 30, 2015: B's name as the debtor: (3) the above creditor Eul borrowed the sum of the third loan certificate of this case from A from January 2, 10, 2000 to January 1, 2010; (4),890,000 interest balance from May; (4) the fourth loan certificate of this case was not disputed; (4) the fact that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition; (5), 4, 5, 6, 9 evidence; and the purport of the entire pleadings; and (3) the purport of the entire pleadings.

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion (1) The Plaintiff’s account transfer or cash payment, etc. to the Defendant from August 13, 2005 to May 19, 2009 as shown in the attached Form.

유사 판례

-인천지방법원 부천지원 2014.02.27 2013고단3290

-서울고등법원 2016.06.08 2015나32006

-창원지방법원진주지원 2020.09.16 2020고단1165

-서울남부지방법원 2017.10.11 2017고단2907

-수원지방법원 2017.09.14 2017나54272