logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.06.23 2014가합33789
회생담보권조사확정재판에 대한 이의의 소
Text

1. The judgment in claim allowance proceedings of Changwon District Court 2014Ma7 dated July 16, 2014 is changed as follows:

Reasons

On the premise of fact, the amount guaranteed on May 22, 2006 No. 160,00,000 C May 14, 2007 3,06,060,000,000 D 330,934,000,000 E 4 August 30, 2007 20,934,000,0000 E 4 November 20, 2007 5, 276,250,000,000 on September 14, 2010 6,6,250,000 G 6,200 or 6,200,000 from the Korea Credit Guarantee Fund under the list of other credit guarantee funds received from the Defendant (the Plaintiff’s consolidated loans and hereinafter referred to as “the Korea Credit Guarantee Fund”).

(hereinafter “The instant loan obligations”). The Industrial Bank of Korea completed the registration of creation of a new mortgage in order to secure the instant loan obligations as follows.

On December 13, 2007, with respect to the land indicated in the separate list No. 1 (hereinafter “instant land”) on December 13, 2007, the first priority collective security (hereinafter “first priority collective security”) with a maximum debt amount of 17 billion won, on April 3, 2008, with respect to the land of this case and machinery and equipment listed in the separate list No. 599 of the Factory Mortgage Act (Article 7 of the Factory Mortgage Act) with a maximum debt amount of 8 billion won as to the second priority collective security (hereinafter “first priority collective security”) stated in the separate list No. 3 of the instant case’s first priority collective security (hereinafter “the machinery and equipment of this case”) on September 2, 2008, the machinery and equipment listed in the separate list No. 3 (Article 7 subparag. 1722 of the Factory Mortgage Act) stated in the separate list No. 271 of the building and the mining foundation No. 370-1, Jul. 30, 2013.

arrow