logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.10.20 2016고단1666
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2016 Highest 1666] On March 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Emi-gu Office operated by the victim D in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Sungwon-si, the Defendant would immediately return the principal amount to the Defendant, stating that “In order to take over the Gelbel in Maim F, it is necessary to deposit the 10% interest if he/she borrowed money, and that the principal will be returned if it is returned.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not think that he will accept the above Gel and planned to use the above money for the personal purpose, such as living expenses, so even if he received the money from the victim, he did not have any intention or ability to return the principal.

The Defendant received KRW 50 million from the victim on April 15, 2013 as the borrowed money.

From that time until October 7, 2013, the Defendant received KRW 138 million from the victim D in total nine times, KRW 120 million in total four times from the victim H, and KRW 60 million in total from the victim I in total four times, and received KRW 318 million in total from the victim I, respectively, until October 7, 2013.

Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving victims, received property and acquired it.

[2016 Highest 2274] On March 2010, the Defendant introduced the Victim K from the J that operates the beauty room, which is called “a L engaged in bond business” to the victim, and the name of L was defluent and refluent.

1. On April 5, 2010, the Defendant concluded on April 5, 2010 that “around April 5, 2010, the Defendant would pay the victim K with high interest on a small-scale factory if he/she lends 30 million won to the victim K, and pay the interest on eight copies per month on the lent money, and make a repayment of the borrowed money by September 5, 2010.”

However, in fact, the defendant misrepresented L, did not engage in the bond business, and was scheduled to use the money borrowed from the victim for living expenses, etc.

The defendant belongs to this.

arrow