logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2012.06.22 2011고합575
사기등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 29, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on October, 201 for a violation of the Act on Promotion of the Game Industry in the Seo-gu District Court’s Seo-Support, etc., and such sentence became final and conclusive on August 6, 2011.

1. The Defendant,

A. On September 19, 2009, the first place of construction D located in Daegu-gu Dong-gu, Daegu-gu, and the facts that the E proxy victim F was aware of working as the safety team leader of the above construction site. The E proxy victim F did not have a plan to conduct bond business and was thought to use the above victim's money as living expenses, etc., and bears approximately KRW 130,000,000 with the card payment, etc., and even if the above victim borrowed money from the above victim, despite the above victim's intent or ability to pay the money, it is a plan to conduct the bond business in the future. It is a plan to conduct the bond business in the future. On September 19, 2009, it is false that the above victim would pay the interest at 10% per month, and will repay the money within three months, and he received the money from the above victim to the Defendant's post office account at around September 19, 2009, and received the money from the victim to the above victim's total amount of 30 to 70 days from July 7, 200.

B. On March 8, 2010, the victim F was demanded by the FF to “the repayment of fines, repair expenses, etc. due to a traffic accident that was caused by the drones while driving on the Highway of Gyeonggi-do,” and the fact is that the defendant was not a prosecutor in the Seoul Eastern Site Inspection but G was not a criminal case even if he received money, so he did not have the intent or ability to conclude the case, even though he did not have the intent or ability to use it in the repayment, living expenses, etc., the above victim was the prosecutor in the Seoul East Eastern Site Inspection and the Dondong Police Station in Daegu East-do is the criminal case.

The case will be resolved by asking the people to correct it.

arrow