A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 03:50 on November 18, 2014, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (traffic assault, etc.) in violation of the said Act (hereinafter “Aggravated Punishment, etc.”) threatened the victim with any injury to the victim by voice D, a proxy driving engineer operating the said vehicle in front of the building B, who is operating the said vehicle on the road in front of the building B, as the victim was prevented.

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim, who is the driver of a vehicle in operation.

2. On November 18, 2014, from around 04:16 to 04:25 of the same day, the Defendant: (a) during the performance of official duties, at the same place as indicated in the preceding paragraph; (b) during the period from around 04:16 to around 04:25 of the same day, the Defendant heard the victim F, who was a slope affiliated with D’s E district unit of the YA and called “payment of acting expenses and returning home” from the victim F, who was a slope belonging to the E district unit of the YA and called “I ambi, ambiened, ambened, ambened, ambened, ambened, etc.”; and (c) during the process of reporting D, the Defendant assaulted F, by assaulting the victim G, who was an inspector belonging to the same global group, who prevented this from doing so.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officials on the receipt and handling of 112 reports.

3. As the date, time, place, etc. mentioned in Paragraph 2 above, the Defendant expressed the victim F’s obses to “Ye franch franch, flusium,” and expressed the victim G “this dog, governance, police flusium, etc.” to the victim G.

In this respect.