1. The judgment of the first instance, including a claim that has been changed in exchange in this court, shall be changed as follows.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for the addition or replacement as stated in the following paragraph (2) among the grounds of the judgment of the first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. On the third side of the judgment of the court of first instance, the following shall be added to the part added or added:

A person shall be appointed.

G. After that, on the date of distribution of the auction case of the real estate auction proceeding in Suwon District Court G with respect to the instant real estate, the distribution schedule was prepared that the Defendant received KRW 107,118,821 as a mortgagee.

[Attachment 18 and 19] A. 6 of the judgment of the court of first instance (based on recognition) added “A. 18 and 19” to “A. 5 of the judgment of the court of first instance.” 5 of the judgment of the court of first instance, “No. 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance” was added to “No. 4. 5. 5 of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. 5 of the judgment of the court of first instance: “The instant mortgage contract constitutes a fraudulent act; thus, the instant contract constitutes a fraudulent act; thus, the Defendant is obligated to cancel the said contract; and to notify the Republic of Korea that the said claim was transferred to B.

A person shall be appointed.

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case, which was changed in exchange in this court, is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is modified as above, and it is so decided as per Disposition.