A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 23:20 on January 27, 2020, the Defendant sought to hear the Defendant’s statement in relation to the above 112 report, “C,” a police officer belonging to the D Zone D Zone DF, which was dispatched to the site after receiving a report from 112, “A,” but, without complying with the above 112 report, the Defendant assaulted the Defendant by cutting off the sprink of slope E by cutting off the sprinke, cutting off the sprinke, cutting off the sprinke, cutting off the sprinke, cutting off the sprinke, drawing the f’s hand to the police bom, and cutting off the bome.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statements made to E and F, photographs of damaged police officers, work logs in the D District, and investigation reports (on-site film and video image);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Selection of an alternative imprisonment with prison labor under Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act or more (i.e., the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects the fact that the defendant has no record of exceeding the fine, and that the defendant has a small amount of money or a horse deposited for victims, etc.).