logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2017.08.18 2017구단16235
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. During the process of the disposition, the Plaintiff’s short-term visit of sojourn status (C-3) on October 20, 2014, the date of entry into the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Pakistan (C-3) of the date of application for refugee status recognition (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on November 21, 2014, the date of application for refugee status recognition (hereinafter “instant disposition”) is November 22, 2016: The fact that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition of rejection of the decision of the court subject to notification on April 21, 2017, which was the date of application for objection, and that there is no ground for recognition of rejection of the decision of the court subject to notification on April 21, 2017, as of January 26, 2017; Gap’s evidence 1,2, Eul’s evidence 1

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is a national of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan (hereinafter “Pakic Republic”).

On April 1, 200, the Plaintiff observed murder in Pakistan, and appeared as a witness in the court and testified.

The murder offender is sentenced to 6 years of imprisonment with prison labor and is living under prison labor.

The release was made.

The Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea, regardless of the Pakistan by threatening the murderer to threaten himself.

As such, since the Plaintiff’s return to Pakistan is likely to be detrimental to gambling, the Plaintiff ought to be recognized as a refugee.

B. Determination 1) Article 2 Subparag. 1 of the Refugee Act defines refugee status as “any foreigner who is unable to be protected or does not want to be protected by the country of nationality due to well-founded fear to recognize that he/she may be injured on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, status as a member of a specific social group, or political opinion, or is a stateless foreigner who is unable to return to or does not want to return to the country in which he/she had resided before entering the Republic of Korea due to such fear.” 2) When comprehensively considering the evidence and evidence set forth in subparagraph 3 as well as the following circumstances that can be known in addition to the purport of the pleading as a whole, the Plaintiff shall be subject to persecution on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, membership of a specific social group, or political opinion.”

arrow