logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.10.19 2017고단3458
협박등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From October 2016, when the Defendant saw with the victim B (V, 53 years of age) from around April 2017, the Defendant heard the horses from the victim of the damage, which led the victim to a sense of respect for the victim, and led the victim to bullying.

1. The Defendant, from May 2, 2010 to May 15:43, 2017, from around 02:10 to around the same day, from the Defendant’s home of the Seo-gu Seoul apartment to the mobile phone (D) of the victim’s cell phone (E), “Wokh, Bahh, Bahhhh, khhhhh, and knhhhhh.”

The last place shall be considered as the last place, if any.

commitments are undertaken.

At that time, the ground is cut up and the ground is cut up.

“Before May 20, 2017, as indicated in the List of Offenses, send letters containing a threat of the victim six times between May 20, 2017, including the transmission of text messages together with the finger photographs.

The victim threatened the victim.

2. After the completion of an educational system with the victim, the Defendant infringed upon his/her residence on several occasions from April 30, 2017 to May 21, 2017, 2000, by dividing the password of the victim’s front door digital language No. 503, which was known to the victim against his/her will, and entering the door by opening a door and entering the door.

3. After completion of an educational task with the victim on April 30, 2017, the Defendant: (a) entered the victim’s house in the manner of the above 2. paragraph (2) of the same Article; and (b) arbitrarily changed the password of the victim’s front door digital language; and (c) made the victim unable to enter the victim’s house through the above front door; (d) thereby impairing the effectiveness of the digital language.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Civil petition documents (including a written complaint and the closure of a letter screen);

1. Application of this Act and subordinate statutes to a investigative report (the addition of letters sent by a suspect A to B) and the closure of a letter screen attached thereto;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 283(1) and 319(1) (mainly inclusive), and 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense.

arrow