All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. In light of the following: (a) the ordinary milch strawer’s sales volume of H livestock farmers; and (b) the inventory volume of the scrap straw straw at the time, Defendant A did not know the fact that the distribution period has elapsed.

The quantity of the instant scrap that was discovered is only about 40 km, and the structure of H’s store structure in the livestock industry is kept for the purpose of selling the instant scrap machine.

subsection (b) of this section.

Whether there was the purpose of sale should not be determined on the basis of only the possibility of sale, and even though it is necessary to conduct a strict review and determination, the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine.

2. According to the judgment of the court below and the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, Defendant A, as properly stated in the court below, with knowledge of the fact that at least the expiration of the circulation period of the instant meat, was kept for sale.

and by negligence, the period of circulation has elapsed.

It is difficult to see it.

We do not accept the Defendants’ assertion of mistake of facts or misapprehension of legal principles.

3. According to the conclusion, all appeals by the Defendants are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.