beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Power] On July 30, 2018, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1,50,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) from the Gunsan Branch of the Jeonju District Court.
【Criminal Facts】
1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving service of the Grandroth in the Ireland.
On December 11, 2019, the Defendant driven the above van at a speed of 20:0,00, and led to a three-lane road from the c private teaching institute to the D Apartment distance at a speed that would not be known by one way.
At the time of night, there was a duty of care to safely drive a person engaged in driving service by examining the right and the right.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, was negligent in neglecting to keep the front section of the Defendant’s car and was driven by the victim E (E, 70 years old) who was waiting for a signal in front of the Defendant’s car, in front of the Defendant’s seat.
After all, the Defendant, by the above occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim E, such as salt, tensions, etc. in light of the influence that requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and suffered injury to the victim G (Nam and 63 years of age) who is a passenger of the said earth and car, for about two weeks of medical treatment, such as salt, tensions, and so on. However, the Defendant got back without any measure, and fleded and escaped.
2. On the date and time set forth in paragraph 1 of this Article, the Defendant driven B, while under the influence of alcohol, the distance of approximately 2.4 km from around the I cafeteria located in H in Gunsan-si to the front roads of Gunsan-si, through the places set forth in paragraph 1, the Defendant driven B, under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.168%.
Accordingly, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act not less than twice the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol provided for in the Road Traffic Act.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. E.