Defendant

All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

1. As to the decision of the court below (2 million won of fine) on the summary of the grounds of appeal, the defendant asserts that the defendant is too unreasonable and unfair, and the prosecutor asserts that it is too uneasible and unfair.

2. The Defendant’s perjury crime of this case constitutes a violation of the justice by impairing the discovery of substantial truth. In light of its contents, the case is not less severe in light of its contents. Defendant’s statement, including the facts charged of this case, was a major part of the judgment on whether a party was guilty in a fraudulent case against D, etc.; Defendant’s confession from the court below to commit the crime of this case in depth, and there are circumstances to be taken into account in light of the relation between the Defendant and D, that: (a) Defendant’s perjury does not affect the Defendant’s judgment on D; (b) Defendant’s perjury does not affect the Defendant’s judgment on D; (c) Defendant’s perjury was over 70 years old; (d) Defendant was a person of distinguished service to the State who was wounded and wounded in Vietnam; and (e) the first offender who had no record of criminal punishment prior to that time; and (e) other similar cases’ equity of sentencing, motive and circumstance of the crime of this case, Defendant’s age after the crime of this case, Defendant’s personality and behavior, and circumstances, etc.

3. The appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.