Defendant

A Company 60,000,000, Defendant B and C Company 40,000,000 each fine.

Punishment of the crime

[Defendant D’s position and duties] From January 2008 to December 2008, Defendant D worked as the head of the domestic business headquarters at A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “A”), Defendant E worked as the head of the domestic business headquarters at B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “B”) from April 2008 to March 2010. Defendant F worked as the head of the domestic business group at C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “C”) from August 2004 to December 2009. Defendant F worked as the head of the public business headquarters at C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “C”)’s general director in charge of the same public business as of January 201, 2010.

Defendant

A, Defendant B, and Defendant C are corporations entities whose main business purposes are each construction business.

[Basic Facts] Five working persons in charge of receiving orders for government-funded construction works, such as AP, B Q, R Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “R”), C, and U.S. (hereinafter “U”), shall hold a meeting at the coffee shop near Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, 2009 on December 2, 2009 and hold a meeting in the same year.

9.2. At the request of the Port of Port and Port, the Public Procurement Service (hereinafter “instant construction”) established a consensus on the bid for the instant construction project (hereinafter “the construction project in question”) that “the bid price in the instant case is determined by the agreement on the price sector to eliminate the possibility of a stimulic competition between construction companies, such as dumping dumping, etc., and to compete only in the design sector,” and the bid price is at least 88-89% of the bid price (the bid price is calculated in comparison with the estimated construction price in the public notice) considering each company’s bid price, by presenting the estimated construction cost and the original design by submitting the lowest and alternative design.”