logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.03.04 2014고단10309
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operates commercial sex acts in heading 1510 and 1316 of Busan Jin-gu Btel.

On October 6, 2014, the Defendant employed two female employees C, D, etc. at the same place of business equipped with cryp, red sea, and DNA products, etc. used for sexual acts, and received KRW 130,000 from the male grandchildren who wished to engage in sexual traffic, and paid KRW 80,00 won to the sexual traffic women, and the remainder is 130,000 won for the sexual traffic, and paid the sexual traffic to the said female employees, and made the sex relationship to the male grandchildren who found to have been found in the same manner as on October 20, 2014, by allowing the said female employees to have sexual relations with the said female employees.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Each statement in preparation D, E, F, G, and C;

1. Reporting on detection of each violation establishment;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing enforcement photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and the Selection of Imprisonment with labor concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act / [Scope of recommending punishment] The basic area (6 months to one year and four months) of types 2 of sexual traffic (mediation, etc. of sexual traffic through receipt, etc. of business fees) / [decision of sentence] / The defendant appears to have the attitude of attempting to commit a crime and opposing himself/herself; although he/she was controlled while operating the above business on October 6, 2014, when he/she was controlled, he/she was placed under control and re-run back again; the defendant has no criminal power; the defendant has no criminal power; and the size of business and profits, etc. are considered.

arrow