logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2015.05.26 2015고정90
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a D-Wurd-Wurt Motor Vehicle.

At around 23:00 on October 31, 2014, the Defendant, at the speed of about 70 km in the speed of 30 km from the right side of the gold-gu to the right side of the museum distance, in front of the museum automatic in the Pungsan-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

At the time, the location is where a three-distance intersection is installed in the front line and there are many signal-based vehicles, so in such a case, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to take care of the front left and right well, to accurately operate the steering system and the brake system, and to prevent the accident from spreading.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence of neglecting the duty at the time of Jeonju, the Defendant followed the Fright-of-age car driven by the victim E (W, 35 years old) who was in the atmosphere of the signal at two-lanes in the same direction, and brought the part of the fright-hand part on the right-hand part of the Defendant’s vehicle. On the other hand, the Defendant continued to receive the part on the part above the Defendant’s vehicle behind the H non-string car driven by the victim G (W, 20 years old) who was in the atmosphere of the signal at the same time.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim E, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and injury to the victim G, such as an unknown brain in detail for two weeks of medical treatment, etc. At the same time, the Defendant, at the same time, destroyed the said non-designated car in an amount equivalent to approximately KRW 7,778,074 of repair cost, and 1,145,828 of repair cost, and escaped without taking necessary measures.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Each police statement to G and E;

1. G statements;

1. A traffic accident report, traffic accident report, accident site and vehicle photograph;

1. Written estimate;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. The Act and subordinate statutes governing the investigation report (in relation to the identification of a suspect).

arrow