logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 공주지원 2021.02.02 2020고단546
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 18:10 on October 23, 2020, the Defendant driven C mast car under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 30km from the section of about 30km from the front of the Defendant’s residence located in B at Sinju to the outer rock distance of about 841, Asan City, i.e., i., e., e., c., under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.085%.

2. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle of Mart Business.

On October 23, 2020, the Defendant driven the foregoing vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of 0.085% among blood transfusions on Oct. 23, 2020, while driving the vehicle at a speed of 0.085%, the Defendant continued to drive the foregoing vehicle at a speed of about 50km per hour from the mouth to the Asan-ro of 841, an additional tri-distance in front of the external cancer distance of 841, Asan-si, Asan-si, Masan-si.

At the time, it is night and the front of that place is an intersection with a crosswalk with signal lights, so there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by reducing speed and by properly examining the front.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence that the Defendant neglected this and did not properly look at the front line while under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant followed the victim D(T, 59 years old)’s e-learning car in the front direction of the Defendant’s driving, and caused the said e-learning car to take the front part of the said e-learning car, and caused the said e-learning car to take the front part of the said e-learning car in the front direction, and caused the said e-learning car to take the front part of said e-learning car.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim D, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of approximately three weeks’ treatment due to occupational negligence as above, and injury to the victim F, such as base salt, tensions, and tensions, etc. in need of approximately two weeks’ treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement D traffic accident report with respect to the police's statement and the situation of the driver at the main place shall be reported respectively.

arrow