logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2016.06.29 2016고단105
건축법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 9,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the owner of multi-family house called Gyeonggi-si C.

1. A person who intends to construct or repair a building in an urban area in violation of the Building Act and the National Land Planning and Utilization Act shall obtain permission from the Special Self-Governing City Mayor, a branch office of a Special Self-Governing Province, or the head of a Si/Gun/Gu, and shall comply with the district unit plan in order to construct or alter the use of

Around July 16, 2012, the Defendant obtained construction permission to construct three households, including a total floor area of 326.03 square meters, one-story multi-household (2 households), two-story (1 household), and two-story (1 household), with respect to the said multi-family house located in a district unit planning zone, and obtained approval for the use of the said multi-family house on March 19, 2013.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, from March 2013 to June 201 of the same year, was in charge of the construction of a site for a detached house in the district unit plan without obtaining permission from the competent authority for large-scale repair from around 2013 to around 30 households, and was in charge of the construction of a site for a detached house in the district unit plan (a public announcement of not more than 4 households around June 10, 2013) but failed to comply therewith, the Defendant arbitrarily extended 12 households in the previous 3 households (6 households in the first floor and 2-story households in the second floor) by installing a studio, a studio, and a studio and a studio in the second floor.

2. A person who intends to construct or install a building or any other facility that creates demand for parking in a district unit planning zone in violation of the Parking Lot Act shall install a parking lot inside such facility or on the site thereof;

Nevertheless, from March 2013 to June 201 of the same year, the Defendant did not install a parking lot inside the facility or in the site of the facility by installing the first floor 2 and the second floor 3 households of the above “C” multi-family house, respectively, in individual rooms, and by expanding the Do joint 12 households.

arrow