logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2016.06.09 2016고단106
건축법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the owner of multi-family house called Pyeongtaek-si C.

1. A person who intends to construct or repair a building in an urban area in violation of the Building Act and the National Land Planning and Utilization Act shall obtain permission from the Special Self-Governing City Mayor, a branch office of a Special Self-Governing Province, or the head of a Si/Gun/Gu, and shall comply with the district unit plan in order to construct or alter the use of

On October 11, 2012, the Defendant obtained a construction permit on the said multi-family house located in a district unit planning zone and obtained approval for the use of the said house on April 10, 2013, on the following grounds: (a) the Defendant constructed a total of three households, including a total of 339.9 square meters in total, a total of 1st floor (2 households), a multi-household (1st household), and a total of 2nd floor (1st household).

Nevertheless, the Defendant, without obtaining permission for large-scale repair from around April 2013 to June 2013, managed the construction of the site of a detached house in the district unit plan at least three households and below the size of the site of a detached house on October 7, 2005 (a public announcement of not more than 4 households around June 10, 2013) but failed to comply therewith, installed a boundary wall and entrance, etc. in the individual room of the first floor and the second floor of the said C multi-family house, and expanded the number of 14 households in the existing three households by arbitrarily installing a studio, a studio, and a studio and a studio.

2. A person who intends to construct or install a building or any other facility that creates demand for parking in a district unit planning zone in violation of the Parking Lot Act shall install a parking lot inside such facility or on the site thereof;

Nevertheless, from April 2013 to June 2013, the Defendant did not install a parking lot on the inside of the facility or on the site thereof while installing a boundary wall, entrance, etc., and expanding the 14 households in the Do joint 14 households, respectively, of the first floor and the second floor of the apartment house C from April 2013 to June 2013.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The defendant;

arrow