logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.04.20 2015고정1905
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 3, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 18:00, at the house of the victim D(31) of the victim D(C Apartment) of Daejeon-dong Daejeon-gu Daejeon-gu Daejeon-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong Daejeon-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong 504, 806; (b) while the victim was her mother-child dispute with the victim, the Defendant got her home while driving gas gas sprayers that he was in possession of withing the Defendant out to the outside, thereby running the gas gas sprayers to the face of the

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D and E;

1. Each protocol of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Photographs and gas sprayers of parts damaged by the skin's self-harm;

1. The injury diagnosis statement [the following circumstances recognized by each evidence in the judgment, i.e., (1) the victim is a man of the first half of the 30th century, and the victim was a man of the 4th century since the date of the occurrence of the instant case, with the corresponding part of the daily volume, and the 4th day pain was continued, and this frame is correct on the upper part of the body, and (2) the degree of the assault committed by the defendant is not easy in light of the methods and means of assault committed by the victim, and in particular, the victim's head part was considerably shocked to the victim.

In full view of the following facts: (a) the victim was receiving medical treatment at the hospital two days after the date of the instant crime; (b) the victim’s name and the victim’s body was recorded in the diagnosis document on the day of the instant case; (c) the victim’s body was consistent with the cause and details of the victim’s bodily injury; and (d) the police officer, who visited the damaged body on the day of the instant case, made a statement to the effect that the victim was faced with the damaged body; and (e) the victim did not discover any other circumstance that is likely to receive the diagnosis after the instant case, or that the doctor did not make a false diagnosis document, as recorded in the criminal facts in the judgment of the Defendant.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Articles of the Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

arrow